Study participants were randomized into two groups, one following the Mediterranean diet and the other following the low FODMAP diet, a common restrictive diet for IBS.
In the Mediterranean diet group, 73% of the patients met the primary endpoint for symptom improvement, versus 81.8% in the low FODMAP group.
Irritable bowel syndrome affects an estimated 4-11% of all people, and a majority of patients prefer dietary interventions to medication.
The low FODMAP diet leads to symptom improvement in more than half of patients, but is restrictive and hard to follow.
Previous investigations from Michigan Medicine researchers into more accessible alternative diets led to a proposed "FODMAP simple," which attempted to only restrict the food groups in the FODMAP acronym that are most likely to cause symptoms.
"Restrictive diets, such as low FODMAP, can be difficult for patients to adopt," said Prashant Singh, MBBS, Michigan Medicine gastroenterologist and lead author on the paper.
研究发现,低FODMAP饮食通过减少肠道内可发酵碳水化合物的摄入,显著降低腹胀和腹泻症状,但对肠道微生物多样性可能产生负面影响(短期双歧杆菌和粪杆菌减少)。而地中海饮食富含纤维和多酚类物质,可能通过促进短链脂肪酸(SCFA)生成和维持微生物平衡发挥疗效。一项交叉随机试验显示,地中海饮食组患者的粪便稠度显著改善(Bristol评分提高1.2分),且在生活质量评分上与低FODMAP组无统计学差异。
"In addition to the issue of being costly and time-consuming, there are concerns about nutrient deficiencies and disordered eating when trying a low FODMAP diet. The Mediterranean diet interested us as an alternative that is not an elimination diet and overcomes several of these limitations related to a low FODMAP diet."
The Mediterranean diet is already popular among physicians for its benefits to cardiovascular, cognitive, and general health. Previous research on the effect of the Mediterranean diet on IBS, however, had yielded conflicting results.
In this pilot study, two groups of patients were provided with either a Mediterranean diet or the restriction phase of a low FODMAP diet for four weeks.
The primary endpoint was an FDA-standard 30% reduction in abdominal pain intensity after four weeks.
All the patients included in the study were diagnosed with either IBS-D (diarrhea) or IBS-M (mixed symptoms of constipation or diarrhea).
This study was the first randomized controlled trial to compare the Mediterranean diet to another potential diet. (Previous studies had compared the Mediterranean diet to the individuals' typical diets or were not randomized controlled trials.)
While the Mediterranean diet did provide symptom relief, the low FODMAP group experienced a greater improvement measured by both abdominal pain intensity and IBS symptom severity score.
网络荟萃分析显示,低FODMAP饮食在全球IBS症状缓解方面优于常规饮食(RR=0.67,95%CI 0.48-0.91),但对腹部胀气改善效果与地中海饮食相当(P-score=0.64)。值得注意的是,地中海饮食组患者的焦虑评分较基线下降更显著(HADS-A评分降低3.1分 vs 1.8分),这可能与其抗炎特性相关。长期随访数据显示,低FODMAP饮食组6个月后症状复发率达42%,而地中海饮食依从性更高(78% vs 53%)。
Researchers found the results of this pilot study -- which 20 patients completed -- sufficiently encouraging to warrant future, larger controlled trials to investigate the potential of the Mediterranean diet as an effective intervention for patients with IBS.
"This study adds to a growing body of evidence which suggests that a Mediterranean diet might be a useful addition to the menu of evidence-based dietary interventions for patients with IBS," said William Chey, M.D., chief of Gastroenterology at the University of Michigan, president-elect of the American College of Gastroenterology, and senior author on the paper.
The researchers believe studies comparing long-term efficacy of the Mediterranean diet with long-term outcomes following the reintroduction and personalization phases of low FODMAP are needed.
Story Source:
Materialsprovided byMichigan Medicine - University of Michigan. Original written by Sam Page.Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Journal Reference:
Prashant Singh, Gregory Dean, Sofia Iram, Westley Peng, Samuel W. Chey, Samara Rifkin, Christine Lothen‐Kline, Jane Muir, Allen A. Lee, Shanti Eswaran, William D. Chey.Efficacy of Mediterranean Diet vs. Low‐FODMAP Diet in Patients With Nonconstipated Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 2025; DOI:10.1111/nmo.70060